Simplifying Container Management with Kubernetes: Exploring IBM and MuleSoft Solutions

     

Parallel problems

Although the offerings I'm about to discuss are different, they're interesting enough to explore more closely. Both IBM and MuleSoft are claiming that the reason for implementing their solutions is because they perceive a lack of skills in containers and Kubernetes.

Cloud and containerizationThis tallies with what I see in the world I work in too. It's one thing to say that you can run a few containers in the wild, but it's quite another to run them as a true cloud environment with hundreds— potentially thousandsof them.

Alongside this, containers are making some architectures change. High Availability (HA) solutions that once looked fine in the VM world now begin to look clunky and new ways of doing HA are springing up. Monitoring now becomes a headache if your failing system was brought down automatically and had been recreated before you even knew you had a problem. Never mind things like license management, where most vendors are struggling to cope with a more flexible model that true cloud requires.

I'll discuss here the two different offerings, and we can see how they are very differentbut trying to solve the same skills issue.

IBM Cloud Private

IBM has recently introduced their new private cloud offering. Essentially this offering includes Kubernetes and Helm and all the good stuff that comes in the world of containers nowadays. IBM has attempted to place this into a "one-stop shop" for your private cloud needsall with a simpler, unified console and interfaces.

This is an on-premise offering only. This is because IBM already has their off-premise solution in what used to be called "Bluemix," but has been renamed (to marry with this offering name) to be "IBM Cloud."

Because IBM sells many products in many configurations, this is not an attempt to create the definitive IBM "platform." IBM is a purveyor of technology. It's up to you, as the customer, to know how to use that technology within your business. Therefore, IBM simply can't produce every possible pattern for every possible situation.

Taking this into account, essentially what IBM has created is a private cloud environment upon which you can run your solutionspreferably all IBM solutions of course. With this base environment, they add on an integrated deployment, management, and monitoring environment. This is their real value-add over and above simply giving you Kubernetes in a box.

MuleSoft: Titan Release

MuleSoft has recently announced the latest release of their MuleSoft Anypoint Platform: Titan release. One part of this release is what they are calling their "Titan Framework." This framework isguess whata Kubernetes-based environment where you can run MuleSoft !

Now, this framework allows users to deploy MuleSoft environments to any environmentwhether that be Azure, AWS, Google cloud or on-premise. The only requirement is that you can provide some machines for it to run on. What the MuleSoft framework then does is deploy Kubernetes and everything else it needs to use to run onto the servers you've supplied.

The deployment of MuleSoft applicationswhether that be API or just raw MuleSoft applicationsare deployed using a centralized control center which is held in the MuleSoft Anypoint cloud (which is actually hosted on AWS). This is different from the IBM solution, which hosts its control center in the on-premise solution itself. However, the point is the same: a central place to easily manage your containerized solution.

Summary

Although the MuleSoft and IBM solutions would appear to be poles apart if you weren't looking carefully; actually, they are both trying to solve the new-world problems of how to run and manage large numbers of containers.

One last thought: At this point, IBM is only supporting their own public cloud and on-premisebut I wonder if they open that up to other clouds soon too?

 

About John Hawkins

John Hawkins Lightwell  

John Hawkins is the CTO for Lightwell.

He has extensive experience in the middleware and integration stack having worked at IBM, IBM Business Partners and WSO2.  

During his time as an IBM MQ architect he led IBM's Cloud strategy and architecture for next generation, Cloud Centric, Messaging. 

John is an innovator and naturally "sees the big picture" which he has demonstrated not only through his work at Lightwell and previous roles, but also his large patent portfolio.

John is an active blogger about integration and cloud topics. Visit his blog at http://talljhawkins.blogspot.co.uk/ and follow him on twitter @TallJHawkins